BFGoodrich vs Hankook – two tire brands that have captured the attention of car enthusiasts and drivers alike.
In this post, I’ll be delving into their history, examining their dry, wet, and snow performances, exploring their mileage warranties, average lifespan, prices, and uncovering the pros and cons of each.
By the end, we’ll determine which brand reigns supreme.
Get ready to embark on an exciting journey of tire exploration!
BFGoodrich vs Hankook – Comparison Table
| BFGoodrich | Hankook | |
| Country of Origin | United States | South Korea |
| Year Founded | 1870 | 1941 |
| Made In | Tuscaloosa, AL, Woodburn, IN, or Opelika, AL in the US | Clarksville, TN or Akron, OH, in addition to South Korea, China, Hungary, Indonesia, Germany, and Japan |
| Parent | Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin SCA (France) | Hankook Tire & Technology Co., Ltd. (South Korea) |
About the Brands
1. BFGoodrich
BFGoodrich, a renowned tire brand, has a rich history that dates back to its founding in 1870 in the United States.
Originally known as Goodrich, the company began producing rubber products and expanded into tires in the late 19th century.
They quickly gained prominence for their quality and innovative designs.
In 1988, Goodrich became a subsidiary of Uniroyal-Goodrich, which later merged with the French tire giant Michelin in 1990.
As a result, BFGoodrich became part of the Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin, solidifying its global presence.
BFGoodrich has always been at the forefront of tire technology, pioneering advancements such as all-terrain tires and radial tires.
Their tires have been trusted by drivers on various terrains, from racetracks to challenging off-road environments.
With a legacy spanning over a century, BFGoodrich continues to deliver high-performance tires, catering to diverse vehicles and driving needs.
Their strong association with Michelin ensures that the brand remains synonymous with quality, durability, and innovation in the tire industry.
Mostly Known for Manufacturing Tires For:
- Passenger cars
- SUVs (Sport Utility Vehicles)
- Trucks
- Off-road vehicles
- Commercial vehicles
2. Hankook
Hankook Tire is a renowned tire brand that originated in South Korea in 1941.
It is a subsidiary of Hankook Tire & Technology Co., Ltd., the parent company responsible for its success.
Over the years, Hankook has established itself as a global leader in the tire industry, catering to diverse vehicles, including passenger cars, SUVs, trucks, and buses.
The company’s commitment to innovation and quality has propelled its growth, allowing it to become one of the largest tire manufacturers worldwide.
With cutting-edge research and development capabilities, Hankook consistently introduces advanced tire technologies, ensuring optimal performance, safety, and durability.
Today, Hankook tires are trusted by millions of drivers around the globe, offering a wide range of products that deliver excellent traction, handling, and comfort across various road conditions.
Mostly Known for Manufacturing Tires For:
- Passenger cars
- SUVs (Sport Utility Vehicles)
- Trucks (including light trucks and medium-duty trucks)
- Buses
- Race cars
- Golf carts
- All-terrain vehicles
Differences
1. Dry Performance
I’m going to compare the performance of two summer tires as they are the ideal type in dry weather.
I’m taking a look at the BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 vs the Hankook Ventus V12 evo2.
In my evaluation, I would rate the BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 with a dry performance of 4.7 out of 5.
This tire has received highly positive ratings for its excellent dry grip, traction, responsiveness, on-center feel, cornering, and handling.
It is also regarded as having the best dry traction amongst its competitors.
On the other hand, the Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scored a 4.6 out of 5, with impressive handling, cornering, and a high-grip silica tread compound.
Despite the slight difference, both tires offer strong dry performance, resulting in a tie.
2. Wet Performance
For the wet performance, I’ll be comparing the BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport vs the Hankook Kinergy GT.
Based on my research and personal rating, I would rate the wet performance of the BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport tire as 3.8 out of 5.
While it offers reasonable wet performance, reviews indicate potential issues with traction, longer stopping distances, and reduced acceleration in certain vehicles without AWD.
On the other hand, the Hankook Kinergy GT tire receives a higher rating of 4.4 out of 5, suggesting better overall wet performance with solid grip, traction, and effective stopping distance.
Therefore, if wet performance is a priority, the Hankook Kinergy GT tire emerges as the better choice.
3. Snow Performance
We all know that you need dedicated winter tires if you’re going to be driving on harsh winter conditions.
That’s why I’ll be comparing the snow performance of two specialized winter tires – BFGoodrich Winter T/A KSI vs Hankook Winter i*cept evo2.
Based on my research and snow performance ratings, I would rate the BFGoodrich Winter T/A KSI tire at 4.5 and the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 at 4.4 on a scale of 1 to 5.
Both tires offer reliable snow performance with enhanced traction and grip.
However, the BFGoodrich Winter T/A KSI tire stands out with its stable drive in deep snow and extreme winter traction capabilities.
Therefore, I declare the BFGoodrich Winter T/A KSI as the better tire for snow performance, albeit by a narrow margin.
4. Mileage Warranty and Tread Life
| BFGoodrich | Hankook | |
| Treadwear Warranty | up to 75,000 miles tread life warranty | up to 100,000 miles tread life warranty |
| Average Tread Life | BFGoodrich tires are expected to last mostly between the 50,000 to 60,000 miles mark. | Hankook tires have an average tread life of around 40,000 to 60,000 miles. |
Based on my research, BFGoodrich and Hankook offer different mileage warranties for their tires.
BFGoodrich provides a treadwear warranty of up to 75,000 miles, while Hankook offers a higher treadwear warranty of up to 100,000 miles.
However, in terms of average lifespan, BFGoodrich tires tend to last between 50,000 to 60,000 miles, whereas Hankook tires have an average tread life ranging from 40,000 to 60,000 miles.
5. Prices
In this section, I’ll be taking a look at the price ranges of both tire brands – BFGoodrich vs Hankook.
I’ll be using one of the biggest tire and wheel retailers in the US for this comparison – Discount Tire.
Here is a comprehensive table that showcases each brand has to offer:
| BFGoodrich | Hankook | |
| Average Price Range (Discount Tire) | $112 to $747 /ea | $87 to $600 /ea |
| Cheapest Tire (Discount Tire) | Advantage Control goes from $112 – $238 /ea | Kinergy ST H735 goes from $80 – $152 /ea |
| Most Expensive Tire (Discount Tire) | Mud Terrain T/A KM3 goes from $217 – $747 /ea | Dynapro MT2 RT05 goes from $191 – $600 /ea |
6. Pros and Cons
BFGoodrich
| Pros | Cons |
| ✔ Competitively priced with above-average mileage on the tread-warranties | ❌ They lack tire diversity compared to other brands, and the brand’s passenger options are limited in sizes |
| ✔ Highly focused and specialized in all-season and off-road tires | |
| ✔ Great option for daily commutes and road trips |
Hankook
| Pros | Cons |
| ✔ Hankook tires are known for their affordable prices | ❌ Limited weather categorization |
| ✔ Good durability and longevity | |
| ✔ Generous mileage warranties of up to 100,000 miles |
7. Popular Tires
Here are some notable tires from BFGoodrich:
- All-Terrain T/A KO2
- Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
- Advantage T/A Sport LT
Some of Hankook’s best tires are shown below:
- Ventus S1 Noble2
- Kinergy PT
- Dynapro AT2
Which Is the Better Brand Overall?
Based on the comparison between BFGoodrich and Hankook tires, it is clear that both brands have their strengths.
In terms of dry performance, they are evenly matched.
However, when it comes to wet performance, the Hankook Kinergy GT tire stands out as the better choice.
For snow performance, the BFGoodrich Winter T/A KSI tire takes a slight lead.
While BFGoodrich offers a lower mileage warranty, Hankook provides a higher one.
Considering all the criteria, I declare this comparison a tie as both brands have their own advantages in different areas.