When it comes to choosing the right tires for your vehicle, the options seem endless.
Among the top contenders are BFGoodrich and Kumho.
In this post, I’ll delve into the world of tires and compare these two renowned brands.
We’ll explore their rich histories, assess their performances in dry, wet, and snowy conditions, examine their mileage warranties, average lifespan, prices, and weigh the pros and cons.
By the end, we’ll determine which brand reigns supreme – BFGoodrich or Kumho.
Let’s dive in!
BFGoodrich vs Kumho – Comparison Table
| BFGoodrich | Kumho | |
| Country of Origin | United States | South Korea |
| Year Founded | 1870 | 1960 |
| Made In | Tuscaloosa, AL, Woodburn, IN, or Opelika, AL in the US | South Korea, or in China or Vietmnam |
| Parent | Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin SCA (France) | Doublestar (China) |
About the Brands
1. BFGoodrich
BFGoodrich, a renowned tire brand, has a rich history that dates back to its founding in 1870 in the United States.
Originally known as Goodrich, the company began producing rubber products and expanded into tires in the late 19th century.
They quickly gained prominence for their quality and innovative designs.
In 1988, Goodrich became a subsidiary of Uniroyal-Goodrich, which later merged with the French tire giant Michelin in 1990.
As a result, BFGoodrich became part of the Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin, solidifying its global presence.
BFGoodrich has always been at the forefront of tire technology, pioneering advancements such as all-terrain tires and radial tires.
Their tires have been trusted by drivers on various terrains, from racetracks to challenging off-road environments.
With a legacy spanning over a century, BFGoodrich continues to deliver high-performance tires, catering to diverse vehicles and driving needs.
Their strong association with Michelin ensures that the brand remains synonymous with quality, durability, and innovation in the tire industry.
Mostly Known for Manufacturing Tires For:
- Passenger cars
- SUVs (Sport Utility Vehicles)
- Trucks
- Off-road vehicles
- Commercial vehicles
2. Kumho
Kumho Tire is a renowned tire brand founded in 1960 in South Korea. It is a subsidiary of the Chinese tire conglomerate Doublestar.
The company has a rich history of innovation and excellence in the tire industry.
Over the years, Kumho has established itself as a global leader, providing high-quality tires for various vehicles.
Since its inception, Kumho has focused on research and development to create cutting-edge tire technologies.
They have continuously invested in improving performance, safety, and environmental sustainability.
The brand’s commitment to quality has earned them recognition and numerous awards.
Kumho’s tire range covers a wide spectrum of applications, including passenger cars, SUVs, trucks, and racing vehicles.
They offer a diverse selection of tires known for their durability, traction, and excellent handling capabilities.
With a strong global presence, Kumho has built a reputation for delivering reliable and innovative tires that meet the needs of drivers worldwide.
Mostly Known for Manufacturing Tires For:
- Passenger cars
- High-performance cars
- SUVs (Sport Utility Vehicles)
- Crossovers
- Light trucks
Differences
1. Dry Performance
I’m going to compare the performance of two summer tires as they are the ideal type in dry weather.
I’m taking a look at the BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 vs the Kumho Ecsta PS91.
After carefully researching and evaluating the dry performance of the BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 and the Kumho Ecsta PS91 tires, I would give the BFGoodrich tire a rating of 4.7 out of 5, while the Kumho tire would receive a rating of 4.6 out of 5.
Both tires excel in various aspects of dry performance, including grip, traction, responsiveness, and handling.
However, with its slightly higher rating and recognition for the best dry traction among its competition, the BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 emerges as the winner in terms of dry performance.
2. Wet Performance
For the wet performance, I’ll be comparing the BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport vs the Kumho Solus TA71.
Based on my research, I would rate the BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport’s wet performance at 3.8 out of 5.
Reviews suggest that while it offers adequate wet performance, there are concerns about longitudinal traction and longer stopping distances.
On the other hand, the Kumho Solus TA71 scores a 4.1 out of 5 for wet performance, with an asymmetric tread design and wide grooves contributing to its reliability.
Although mixed reviews impact its overall rating, the Kumho Solus TA71 seems to offer slightly better wet performance.
Therefore, I declare the Kumho Solus TA71 as the winner in terms of wet performance.
3. Snow Performance
We all know that you need dedicated winter tires if you’re going to be driving on harsh winter conditions.
That’s why I’ll be comparing the snow performance of two specialized winter tires – BFGoodrich Winter T/A KSI vs Kumho WinterCraft WP71.
In my evaluation, based on the research conducted, I personally rate the BFGoodrich Winter T/A KSI tire with a snow performance rating of 4.5 out of 5.
This tire demonstrates reliable snow performance with its high sipe density, saw-toothed groove edges, and a new compound that enhances traction on snowy surfaces.
Its ability to handle extreme winter conditions and provide extreme winter traction further contribute to its snow performance rating.
As for the Kumho WinterCraft WP71, it receives a snow performance rating of 4.4 out of 5.
While it offers good handling and stability, its uniform block design and directional tread pattern make it suitable for snowy and icy conditions.
Ultimately, the BFGoodrich Winter T/A KSI emerges as the winner, albeit with a marginal lead.
4. Mileage Warranty and Tread Life
| BFGoodrich | Kumho | |
| Treadwear Warranty | up to 75,000 miles tread life warranty | Replacement for unserviceable tires with more than 2/32″ tread remaining |
| Average Tread Life | BFGoodrich tires are expected to last mostly between the 50,000 to 60,000 miles mark. | Kumho tires are known for their long-lasting performance, with most of their tires lasting from 60,000 to 80,000 miles. |
After conducting research on BFGoodrich and Kumho tires, I found that BFGoodrich offers a mileage warranty of up to 75,000 miles, while Kumho provides a replacement for unserviceable tires with more than 2/32″ tread remaining.
On average, BFGoodrich tires tend to last between 50,000 to 60,000 miles.
In comparison, Kumho tires are known for their long-lasting performance, with most lasting from 60,000 to 80,000 miles.
5. Prices
In this section, I’ll be taking a look at the price ranges of both tire brands – BFGoodrich vs Kumho.
I’ll be using one of the biggest tire and wheel retailers in the US for this comparison – Discount Tire.
Here is a comprehensive table that showcases each brand has to offer:
| BFGoodrich | Kumho | |
| Average Price Range (Discount Tire) | $112 to $747 /ea | $54 to $550 /ea |
| Cheapest Tire (Discount Tire) | Advantage Control goes from $112 – $238 /ea | Solus TA11 goes from $54 – $158 /ea |
| Most Expensive Tire (Discount Tire) | Mud Terrain T/A KM3 goes from $217 – $747 /ea | Road Venture MT71 goes from $222 – $550 /ea |
6. Pros and Cons
BFGoodrich
| Pros | Cons |
| ✔ Competitively priced with above-average mileage on the tread-warranties | ❌ They lack tire diversity compared to other brands, and the brand’s passenger options are limited in sizes |
| ✔ Highly focused and specialized in all-season and off-road tires | |
| ✔ Great option for daily commutes and road trips |
Kumho
| Pros | Cons |
| ✔ They can last a long time aka their tread life is amazing | ❌ Limited market presence |
| ✔ Good value for money | |
| ✔ They offer good performance |
7. Popular Tires
Here are some notable tires from BFGoodrich:
- All-Terrain T/A KO2
- Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
- Advantage T/A Sport LT
Some of Kumho’s best tires are shown below:
- Ecsta PS31
- Solus TA71
- Road Venture AT51
Which Is the Better Brand Overall?
Based on the evaluation of dry performance, the BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 takes the lead.
However, when it comes to wet performance, the Kumho Solus TA71 emerges as the winner.
In terms of snow performance, the BFGoodrich Winter T/A KSI has a slight edge.
While BFGoodrich offers a mileage warranty of up to 75,000 miles, Kumho tires are known for their longer lifespan.
Considering all these factors, I declare BFGoodrich as the better pick overall, with its strong dry performance and competitive pricing.