When it comes to choosing the right tires for your vehicle, the options seem endless.
That’s why I’ve decided to delve into the world of tire brands and compare two popular contenders: Hankook vs Yokohama.
In this post, we’ll explore their captivating histories, evaluate their performances in dry, wet, and snowy conditions, analyze their mileage warranties and lifespan, examine their prices, and weigh the pros and cons.
By the end, we’ll uncover which brand reigns supreme.
So, let’s dive in and discover the ultimate tire brand for your needs!
Hankook vs Yokohama – Comparison Table
| Hankook | Yokohama | |
| Country of Origin | South Korea | Japan |
| Year Founded | 1941 | 1917 |
| Made In | Clarksville, TN or Akron, OH, in addition to South Korea, China, Hungary, Indonesia, Germany, and Japan | Salem, VA, West Point, MS, or Tokyo, Japan |
| Parent | Hankook Tire & Technology Co., Ltd. (South Korea) | Furukawa Group (Japan) |
About the Brands
1. Hankook
Hankook Tire is a renowned tire brand that originated in South Korea in 1941.
It is a subsidiary of Hankook Tire & Technology Co., Ltd., the parent company responsible for its success.
Over the years, Hankook has established itself as a global leader in the tire industry, catering to diverse vehicles, including passenger cars, SUVs, trucks, and buses.
The company’s commitment to innovation and quality has propelled its growth, allowing it to become one of the largest tire manufacturers worldwide.
With cutting-edge research and development capabilities, Hankook consistently introduces advanced tire technologies, ensuring optimal performance, safety, and durability.
Today, Hankook tires are trusted by millions of drivers around the globe, offering a wide range of products that deliver excellent traction, handling, and comfort across various road conditions.
Mostly Known for Manufacturing Tires For:
- Passenger cars
- SUVs (Sport Utility Vehicles)
- Trucks (including light trucks and medium-duty trucks)
- Buses
- Race cars
- Golf carts
- All-terrain vehicles
2. Yokohama
Yokohama is a renowned tire brand with a rich history that dates back to 1917.
Founded in Japan in a joint venture between Yokohama Cable Manufacturing and B.F. Goodrich, Yokohama tires have become synonymous with quality and performance.
The brand is now a subsidiary of the Furukawa Group.
Over the years, Yokohama has established itself as a global leader in the tire industry, offering a wide range of products for various vehicles, including cars, trucks, and SUVs.
With a focus on cutting-edge technology and tire engineering, Yokohama has consistently delivered high-performance tires that provide excellent traction, durability, and fuel efficiency.
The brand’s commitment to quality and innovation has earned it a loyal customer base worldwide, making Yokohama a trusted choice for drivers seeking reliable and high-performing tires.
Mostly Known for Manufacturing Tires For:
- Passenger cars
- Performance cars
- SUVs (Sport Utility Vehicles)
- Mini vans
- Crossovers
- Trucks
- Vans
- High-performance vehicles
- Commercial vehicles
- Tractors
- Bicycles
Differences
1. Dry Performance
I’m going to compare the performance of two summer tires as they are the ideal type in dry weather.
I’m taking a look at the Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 vs the Yokohama Advan Sport V105.
In my evaluation, I give the Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 a dry performance rating of 4.6 out of 5.
This tire has received high praise for its impressive handling, cornering capabilities, and the utilization of technologies to enhance dry terrain handling.
The incorporation of a high-grip silica tread compound further suggests strong dry traction capabilities.
Additionally, its aero-dynamic design with noise-reducing sidewall dimples adds to its appeal.
On the other hand, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 receives a dry performance rating of 4.8 out of 5.
This tire offers superior handling, wider tread blocks for enhanced dry performance, maximum grip, a quiet and comfortable ride, and positive customer reviews.
These features make it an excellent choice for performance-oriented vehicles and drivers seeking precise and confident driving experiences on dry roads.
Based on these evaluations, I conclude that the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 edges slightly ahead with its slightly higher rating of 4.8, while the Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 follows closely with a rating of 4.6.
Therefore, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 is the winner in terms of dry performance.
2. Wet Performance
For the wet performance, I’ll be comparing the Hankook Kinergy GT vs the Yokohama Avid Ascend GT.
In my evaluation, I rate the Hankook Kinergy GT tire with a wet performance rating of 4.4, indicating commendable grip, traction, and efficient stopping in wet conditions.
On the other hand, the Yokohama Avid Ascend GT tire boasts a wet performance rating of 4.6, showcasing exceptional hydroplaning resistance and stable handling in rainy weather.
Additionally, its all-season design and TriBLEND compound technology contribute to its wet performance capabilities.
Therefore, considering the slightly higher rating and the additional features, I declare the Yokohama Avid Ascend GT tire as the superior choice for wet performance.
3. Snow Performance
We all know that you need dedicated winter tires if you’re going to be driving on harsh winter conditions.
That’s why I’ll be comparing the snow performance of two specialized winter tires – Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c.
As the one giving the snow performance rating from 1 to 5, I have carefully considered the research on both tires.
Based on my evaluation, the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 receives a snow performance rating of 4.4, while the Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c receives a rating of 4.5.
Both tires exhibit impressive features that enhance traction and grip in snowy conditions.
However, considering the slightly higher rating, the Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c emerges as the winner in terms of snow performance.
4. Mileage Warranty and Tread Life
| Hankook | Yokohama | |
| Treadwear Warranty | up to 100,000 miles tread life warranty | up to 80,000 miles tread life warranty |
| Average Tread Life | Hankook tires have an average tread life of around 40,000 to 60,000 miles. | Yokohama tires can last anywhere between 50,000 to 85,000 miles. |
Based on my research, the Hankook tires come with a mileage warranty of up to 100,000 miles, while the Yokohama tires have a warranty of up to 80,000 miles.
However, in terms of average lifespan, Hankook tires tend to last around 40,000 to 60,000 miles, while Yokohama tires can go for 50,000 to 85,000 miles.
So, while the Hankook tires have a longer warranty, the Yokohama tires generally have a slightly longer average lifespan.
5. Prices
In this section, I’ll be taking a look at the price ranges of both tire brands – Hankook vs Yokohama.
I’ll be using one of the biggest tire and wheel retailers in the US for this comparison – Discount Tire.
Here is a comprehensive table that showcases each brand has to offer:
| Hankook | Yokohama | |
| Average Price Range (Discount Tire) | $87 to $600 /ea | $68 to $805 /ea |
| Cheapest Tire (Discount Tire) | Kinergy ST H735 goes from $80 – $152 /ea | Iceguard IG53 goes from $68 – $197 /ea |
| Most Expensive Tire (Discount Tire) | Dynapro MT2 RT05 goes from $191 – $600 /ea | Advan Sport goes from $255 – $805 /ea |
6. Pros and Cons
Hankook
| Pros | Cons |
| ✔ Hankook tires are known for their affordable prices | ❌ Limited weather categorization |
| ✔ Good durability and longevity | |
| ✔ Generous mileage warranties of up to 100,000 miles |
Yokohama
| Pros | Cons |
| ✔ Reasonable pricing, offering good value for their cost | ❌ None |
| ✔ Excellent traction, particularly in dry conditions | |
| ✔ Stable and safe handling |
7. Popular Tires
Here are some notable tires from Hankook:
- Ventus S1 Noble2
- Kinergy PT
- Dynapro AT2
Some of Yokohama’s best tires are shown below:
- Advan Apex V601
- Avid Ascend GT
- Geolandar A/T G015
Which Is the Better Brand Overall?
Based on the evaluations of dry performance, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 takes the lead with a rating of 4.8, closely followed by the Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 with a rating of 4.6.
For wet performance, the Yokohama Avid Ascend GT outshines with a rating of 4.6, compared to the Hankook Kinergy GT’s rating of 4.4.
In terms of snow performance, the Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c wins with a rating of 4.5, slightly surpassing the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2’s rating of 4.4.
Considering the overall evaluations, Yokohama emerges as the better pick.
