As a car enthusiast, I’ve always been intrigued by the never-ending debate surrounding tire brands.
Today, I’ll be diving into the Falken vs Yokohama showdown, comparing these two tire giants in every aspect imaginable.
From their rich histories and performance in dry, wet, and snowy conditions to their mileage warranties, average lifespan, prices, and pros and cons, we’ll leave no stone unturned.
Join me as we uncover the ultimate winner in the battle of Falken vs Yokohama.
Falken vs Yokohama – Comparison Table
| Falken | Yokohama | |
| Country of Origin | Japan | Japan |
| Year Founded | 1983 | 1917 |
| Made In | Buffalo, NY, Japan, or Thailand | Salem, VA, West Point, MS, or Tokyo, Japan |
| Parent | Sumitomo Rubber Industries (Japan) | Furukawa Group (Japan) |
About the Brands
1. Falken
Falken is a renowned tire brand that originated in Japan in 1983.
It is a subsidiary of Sumitomo Rubber Industries, a prominent Japanese company.
From its inception, Falken has strived to deliver high-quality tires that combine performance and durability.
Over the years, the brand has gained recognition for its innovative technologies and commitment to excellence.
Falken has made significant advancements in tire engineering, constantly pushing boundaries to enhance driving experiences.
With a focus on motorsport and extensive research and development, Falken has developed a diverse range of tires for various vehicles, including passenger cars, trucks, and SUVs.
With its Japanese precision and expertise, Falken continues to cater to the needs of drivers worldwide, earning a reputation as a trusted and reliable tire brand.
Mostly Known for Manufacturing Tires For:
- Passenger cars
- Light trucks
- Medium trucks
- SUVs (Sport Utility Vehicles)
- Crossovers
2. Yokohama
Yokohama is a renowned tire brand with a rich history that dates back to 1917.
Founded in Japan in a joint venture between Yokohama Cable Manufacturing and B.F. Goodrich, Yokohama tires have become synonymous with quality and performance.
The brand is now a subsidiary of the Furukawa Group.
Over the years, Yokohama has established itself as a global leader in the tire industry, offering a wide range of products for various vehicles, including cars, trucks, and SUVs.
With a focus on cutting-edge technology and tire engineering, Yokohama has consistently delivered high-performance tires that provide excellent traction, durability, and fuel efficiency.
The brand’s commitment to quality and innovation has earned it a loyal customer base worldwide, making Yokohama a trusted choice for drivers seeking reliable and high-performing tires.
Mostly Known for Manufacturing Tires For:
- Passenger cars
- Performance cars
- SUVs (Sport Utility Vehicles)
- Mini vans
- Crossovers
- Trucks
- Vans
- High-performance vehicles
- Commercial vehicles
- Tractors
- Bicycles
Differences
1. Dry Performance
I’m going to compare the performance of two summer tires as they are the ideal type in dry weather.
I’m taking a look at the Falken Azenis FK510 vs the Yokohama Advan Sport V105.
In my evaluation of the Falken Azenis FK510 and the Yokohama Advan Sport V105, I rate the dry performance of the Falken Azenis FK510 at 4.6 out of 5.
This tire has received commendable reviews for its short dry braking distances, excellent grip, and consistent performance even at high speeds.
Similarly, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 achieves a rating of 4.8 out of 5 for its superior handling, maximum grip, and positive customer feedback.
Both tires offer impressive dry performance capabilities, making it difficult to declare a clear winner.
Thus, I deem it a tie between the two options.
2. Wet Performance
For the wet performance, I’ll be comparing the Falken Ziex ZE950 A/S vs the Yokohama Avid Ascend GT.
In my assessment, both the Falken Ziex ZE950 A/S and the Yokohama Avid Ascend GT exhibit outstanding wet performance, each earning a rating of 4.6 out of 5.
They both excel in wet traction, hydroplaning resistance, and handling on wet roads.
The Falken Ziex ZE950 A/S is praised for its all-season capabilities, while the Yokohama Avid Ascend GT’s TriBLEND compound technology enhances its wet performance.
Therefore, it is difficult to declare a clear winner; both tires offer similar levels of exceptional wet performance.
3. Snow Performance
We all know that you need dedicated winter tires if you’re going to be driving on harsh winter conditions.
That’s why I’ll be comparing the snow performance of two specialized winter tires – Falken Espia EPZ II vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c.
Based on my personal snow performance rating from 1 to 5, I would rate the Falken Espia EPZ II tire as 4.7, indicating strong traction and performance in icy, slushy, and snowy conditions.
The incorporation of advanced technology in tread design, compound, and construction adds positively to its score.
Additionally, the positive reviews and the asymmetrical tread pattern enhancing handling in snowy conditions further support its capabilities.
The Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c tire, on the other hand, receives a rating of 4.5, suggesting reliable snow performance with features like the extra-wide center rib, large control blocks, slush grooves, deep treads, and optimal traction.
Overall, the Falken Espia EPZ II tire appears to offer slightly better snow performance, making it the winner in this comparison.
4. Mileage Warranty and Tread Life
| Falken | Yokohama | |
| Treadwear Warranty | up to 80,000 miles tread life warranty | up to 80,000 miles tread life warranty |
| Average Tread Life | Falken tires are generally expected to last anywhere from 20,000 to 80,000 miles. | Yokohama tires can last anywhere between 50,000 to 85,000 miles. |
Based on my research, both Falken and Yokohama tires offer treadwear warranties of up to 80,000 miles, indicating their potential longevity.
However, when it comes to average lifespan, Falken tires generally last between 20,000 and 80,000 miles.
In comparison, Yokohama tires tend to have a longer average lifespan, ranging from 50,000 to 85,000 miles.
Therefore, if you prioritize durability and extended use, Yokohama tires may be a more suitable choice.
5. Prices
In this section, I’ll be taking a look at the price ranges of both tire brands – Falken vs Yokohama.
I’ll be using one of the biggest tire and wheel retailers in the US for this comparison – Discount Tire.
Here is a comprehensive table that showcases each brand has to offer:
| Falken | Yokohama | |
| Average Price Range (Discount Tire) | $67 to $579 /ea | $68 to $805 /ea |
| Cheapest Tire (Discount Tire) | Pro G5 Touring A/S goes from $67 – $150 /ea | Iceguard IG53 goes from $68 – $197 /ea |
| Most Expensive Tire (Discount Tire) | Wildpeak R/T01 goes from $277 – $579 /ea | Advan Sport goes from $255 – $805 /ea |
6. Pros and Cons
Falken
| Pros | Cons |
| ✔ Performance and stability, especially at high speeds | ❌ No the best dry road braking performance |
| ✔ Generally more affordable compared to other premium brands | |
| ✔ Praised for their off-road performance |
Yokohama
| Pros | Cons |
| ✔ Reasonable pricing, offering good value for their cost | ❌ None |
| ✔ Excellent traction, particularly in dry conditions | |
| ✔ Stable and safe handling |
7. Popular Tires
Here are some notable tires from Falken:
- Azenis FK510
- Ziex ZE950 A/S
- Wildpeak A/T Trail
Some of Yokohama’s best tires are shown below:
- Advan Apex V601
- Avid Ascend GT
- Geolandar A/T G015
Which Is the Better Brand Overall?
After carefully considering the dry performance, wet performance, snow performance, mileage warranty, average lifespan, and pros and cons of Falken and Yokohama tires, it is difficult to declare a clear winner.
Both brands offer impressive capabilities in various areas, making it a tie overall.
However, if you prioritize durability and extended use, Yokohama tires may be a slightly better choice due to their longer average lifespan.