When it comes to finding the perfect tires for your vehicle, the options can be overwhelming.
That’s why I decided to dive deep into the Continental vs Yokohama debate.
In this post, I’ll take you on a journey through the history of these two tire brands and compare their dry, wet, and snow performances.
We’ll also explore their mileage warranties, average lifespan, prices, and weigh their pros and cons.
By the end, we’ll determine which brand reigns supreme.
Let’s get started!
Continental vs Yokohama – Comparison Table
| Continental | Yokohama | |
| Country of Origin | Germany | Japan |
| Year Founded | 1871 | 1917 |
| Made In | mostly in Germany but they have manufacturing facilities in the United States and possibly China | Salem, VA, West Point, MS, or Tokyo, Japan |
| Parent | Schaeffler Group (Germany) | Furukawa Group (Japan) |
About the Brands
1. Continental
Continental, a renowned tire brand, has a rich history that dates back to its founding in Germany in 1871.
Originally known as Continental-Caoutchouc und Gutta-Percha Compagnie, the company started as a rubber manufacturer and soon diversified into producing bicycle tires.
Over the years, Continental expanded its product range, delving into automobile tires and becoming a leading tire manufacturer globally.
Under the umbrella of its parent company, Schaeffler Group, the brand has continued to innovate and excel.
Renowned for its commitment to safety, performance, and quality, Continental has become a trusted choice for drivers worldwide.
With a legacy spanning over a century and a half, Continental has earned a reputation for excellence and has become synonymous with German engineering and precision.
Today, it stands as one of the world’s leading tire brands, offering a wide range of products for various vehicles, from passenger cars to motorcycles and commercial vehicles.
Mostly Known for Manufacturing Tires For:
- Passenger cars
- Trucks
- Buses
- SUVs (Sport Utility Vehicles)
- Vans
- Motorcycles
- Bicycles
2. Yokohama
Yokohama is a renowned tire brand with a rich history that dates back to 1917.
Founded in Japan in a joint venture between Yokohama Cable Manufacturing and B.F. Goodrich, Yokohama tires have become synonymous with quality and performance.
The brand is now a subsidiary of the Furukawa Group.
Over the years, Yokohama has established itself as a global leader in the tire industry, offering a wide range of products for various vehicles, including cars, trucks, and SUVs.
With a focus on cutting-edge technology and tire engineering, Yokohama has consistently delivered high-performance tires that provide excellent traction, durability, and fuel efficiency.
The brand’s commitment to quality and innovation has earned it a loyal customer base worldwide, making Yokohama a trusted choice for drivers seeking reliable and high-performing tires.
Mostly Known for Manufacturing Tires For:
- Passenger cars
- Performance cars
- SUVs (Sport Utility Vehicles)
- Mini vans
- Crossovers
- Trucks
- Vans
- High-performance vehicles
- Commercial vehicles
- Tractors
- Bicycles
Differences
1. Dry Performance
I’m going to compare the performance of two summer tires as they are the ideal type in dry weather.
I’m taking a look at the Continental ExtremeContact Sport vs the Yokohama Advan Sport V105.
In my evaluation, I rate the dry performance of the Continental ExtremeContact Sport at 4.6 out of 5.
It has received high praise for its superior dry handling and good dry braking.
The SportPlus Technology and two-ply sidewall construction further demonstrate its strong capabilities.
On the other hand, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 receives a rating of 4.8 out of 5 for its exceptional dry performance, offering superior handling, wider tread blocks, maximum grip, and positive customer feedback.
Considering these ratings, I declare the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 as the winner in terms of dry performance.
2. Wet Performance
For the wet performance, I’ll be comparing the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus vs the Yokohama Avid Ascend GT.
In my evaluation, the Yokohama Avid Ascend GT tire receives a wet performance rating of 4.6 out of 5, while the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus tire receives a rating of 4.4 out of 5.
Both tires exhibit impressive wet performance characteristics, including excellent grip, stability, and handling.
However, with its outstanding hydroplaning resistance, stable handling, and TriBLEND compound technology, the Yokohama Avid Ascend GT emerges as the winner in terms of wet performance.
3. Snow Performance
We all know that you need dedicated winter tires if you’re going to be driving on harsh winter conditions.
That’s why I’ll be comparing the snow performance of two specialized winter tires – Continental WinterContact SI vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c.
In my evaluation, I rate the snow performance of the Continental WinterContact SI tire at 4.4 out of 5.
Its structured siping, advanced tread compound, and suitability for snowy and wet conditions contribute to its positive score.
On the other hand, the Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c tire receives a rating of 4.5 out of 5 for its reliable snow performance, thanks to features like the extra-wide center rib, large control blocks, slush grooves, deep treads, and optimal traction.
As the one giving these snow performance ratings, I declare this comparison between the two tires a tie, as they both offer similar levels of snow performance.
4. Mileage Warranty and Tread Life
| Continental | Yokohama | |
| Treadwear Warranty | up to 80,000 miles tread life warranty | up to 80,000 miles tread life warranty |
| Average Tread Life | Continental tires are expected to have a lifespan of 20,000 to 70,000 miles. | Yokohama tires can last anywhere between 50,000 to 85,000 miles. |
Based on my research, both Continental and Yokohama tires offer a treadwear warranty of up to 80,000 miles, indicating their durability.
However, in terms of average lifespan, Continental tires generally last between 20,000 and 70,000 miles.
In contrast, Yokohama tires tend to have a longer average lifespan, ranging from 50,000 to 85,000 miles.
Therefore, if you’re looking for tires with a potentially longer lifespan, Yokohama may be a better choice.
5. Prices
In this section, I’ll be taking a look at the price ranges of both tire brands – Continental vs Yokohama.
I’ll be using one of the biggest tire and wheel retailers in the US for this comparison – Discount Tire.
Here is a comprehensive table that showcases each brand has to offer:
| Continental | Yokohama | |
| Average Price Range (Discount Tire) | $81 to $614 /ea | $68 to $805 /ea |
| Cheapest Tire (Discount Tire) | Control Contact Tour A/S PLUS goes from $81 – $192 /ea | Iceguard IG53 goes from $68 – $197 /ea |
| Most Expensive Tire (Discount Tire) | Scandinavia HD3 goes from $614 /ea | Advan Sport goes from $255 – $805 /ea |
6. Pros and Cons
Continental
| Pros | Cons |
| ✔ Advanced technologies that provide maximum fuel-saving, noise reduction, and performance | ❌ Fewer options compared to other brands |
| ✔ Strong reputation in the tire industry | |
| ✔ They are known for their reliability, comfort, and quietness |
Yokohama
| Pros | Cons |
| ✔ Reasonable pricing, offering good value for their cost | ❌ None |
| ✔ Excellent traction, particularly in dry conditions | |
| ✔ Stable and safe handling |
7. Popular Tires
Here are some notable tires from Continental:
- ExtremeContact DWS 06
- TrueContact Tour
- TerrainContact A/T
Some of Yokohama’s best tires are shown below:
- Advan Apex V601
- Avid Ascend GT
- Geolandar A/T G015
Which Is the Better Brand Overall?
Based on the evaluations of dry performance, Yokohama Advan Sport V105 takes the lead.
When it comes to wet performance, Yokohama Avid Ascend GT emerges as the winner.
In terms of snow performance, it’s a tie between Continental WinterContact SI and Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c.
While both brands offer impressive mileage warranties, Yokohama tires tend to have a longer average lifespan.
Considering these factors, Yokohama emerges as the better pick overall, offering great value, excellent traction, and stable handling.