When it comes to choosing the perfect tires for my vehicle, I’ve always found myself torn between BFGoodrich and Yokohama.
In this post, I’ll be diving deep into the BFGoodrich vs Yokohama debate.
We’ll explore their rich histories, assess their performances on dry, wet, and snowy terrains, examine their mileage warranties and average lifespan, compare their prices, and weigh their pros and cons.
By the end, we’ll uncover which brand reigns supreme.
Let’s embark on this tire journey together!
BFGoodrich vs Yokohama – Comparison Table
| BFGoodrich | Yokohama | |
| Country of Origin | United States | Japan |
| Year Founded | 1870 | 1917 |
| Made In | Tuscaloosa, AL, Woodburn, IN, or Opelika, AL in the US | Salem, VA, West Point, MS, or Tokyo, Japan |
| Parent | Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin SCA (France) | Furukawa Group (Japan) |
About the Brands
1. BFGoodrich
BFGoodrich, a renowned tire brand, has a rich history that dates back to its founding in 1870 in the United States.
Originally known as Goodrich, the company began producing rubber products and expanded into tires in the late 19th century.
They quickly gained prominence for their quality and innovative designs.
In 1988, Goodrich became a subsidiary of Uniroyal-Goodrich, which later merged with the French tire giant Michelin in 1990.
As a result, BFGoodrich became part of the Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin, solidifying its global presence.
BFGoodrich has always been at the forefront of tire technology, pioneering advancements such as all-terrain tires and radial tires.
Their tires have been trusted by drivers on various terrains, from racetracks to challenging off-road environments.
With a legacy spanning over a century, BFGoodrich continues to deliver high-performance tires, catering to diverse vehicles and driving needs.
Their strong association with Michelin ensures that the brand remains synonymous with quality, durability, and innovation in the tire industry.
Mostly Known for Manufacturing Tires For:
- Passenger cars
- SUVs (Sport Utility Vehicles)
- Trucks
- Off-road vehicles
- Commercial vehicles
2. Yokohama
Yokohama is a renowned tire brand with a rich history that dates back to 1917.
Founded in Japan in a joint venture between Yokohama Cable Manufacturing and B.F. Goodrich, Yokohama tires have become synonymous with quality and performance.
The brand is now a subsidiary of the Furukawa Group.
Over the years, Yokohama has established itself as a global leader in the tire industry, offering a wide range of products for various vehicles, including cars, trucks, and SUVs.
With a focus on cutting-edge technology and tire engineering, Yokohama has consistently delivered high-performance tires that provide excellent traction, durability, and fuel efficiency.
The brand’s commitment to quality and innovation has earned it a loyal customer base worldwide, making Yokohama a trusted choice for drivers seeking reliable and high-performing tires.
Mostly Known for Manufacturing Tires For:
- Passenger cars
- Performance cars
- SUVs (Sport Utility Vehicles)
- Mini vans
- Crossovers
- Trucks
- Vans
- High-performance vehicles
- Commercial vehicles
- Tractors
- Bicycles
Differences
1. Dry Performance
I’m going to compare the performance of two summer tires as they are the ideal type in dry weather.
I’m taking a look at the BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 vs the Yokohama Advan Sport V105.
Based on my research and personal dry performance rating, I would rate the BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 with a 4.7 out of 5.
It received highly positive reviews for its excellent dry grip, traction, responsiveness, cornering, and handling.
On the other hand, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 received a slightly higher rating of 4.8 out of 5.
It offers superior handling, wider tread blocks for enhanced dry performance, maximum grip, a comfortable ride, and positive customer feedback.
Therefore, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 slightly edges out the BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 in terms of dry performance.
2. Wet Performance
For the wet performance, I’ll be comparing the BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport vs the Yokohama Avid Ascend GT.
Based on my research and ratings, I would rate the wet performance of the BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport tire at 3.8 out of 5.
While it offers adequate wet performance, there are concerns regarding longitudinal traction, stopping distances, and acceleration in certain vehicles.
On the other hand, the Yokohama Avid Ascend GT tire receives a higher wet performance rating of 4.6 out of 5.
It excels in wet conditions with excellent hydroplaning resistance and stable handling.
Therefore, the Yokohama Avid Ascend GT emerges as the better tire for wet performance.
3. Snow Performance
We all know that you need dedicated winter tires if you’re going to be driving on harsh winter conditions.
That’s why I’ll be comparing the snow performance of two specialized winter tires – BFGoodrich Winter T/A KSI vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c.
In my assessment, both the BFGoodrich Winter T/A KSI and the Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c tires exhibit excellent snow performance, with a rating of 4.5 out of 5 for each.
The BFGoodrich tire boasts high sipe density, saw-toothed groove edges, and a new compound, delivering enhanced traction on snowy surfaces.
On the other hand, the Yokohama tire features an extra-wide center rib, large control blocks, slush grooves, deep treads, and optimal traction.
Given their comparable snow performance ratings, I declare it a tie between these two exceptional tires.
4. Mileage Warranty and Tread Life
| BFGoodrich | Yokohama | |
| Treadwear Warranty | up to 75,000 miles tread life warranty | up to 80,000 miles tread life warranty |
| Average Tread Life | BFGoodrich tires are expected to last mostly between the 50,000 to 60,000 miles mark. | Yokohama tires can last anywhere between 50,000 to 85,000 miles. |
Based on my research, the mileage warranty and average lifespan of BFGoodrich and Yokohama tires differ slightly.
BFGoodrich offers a treadwear warranty of up to 75,000 miles, while Yokohama provides a warranty of up to 80,000 miles.
On average, BFGoodrich tires tend to last between 50,000 to 60,000 miles, whereas Yokohama tires can endure anywhere from 50,000 to 85,000 miles.
While the warranties are similar, Yokohama tires boast a slightly longer potential lifespan.
5. Prices
In this section, I’ll be taking a look at the price ranges of both tire brands – BFGoodrich vs Yokohama.
I’ll be using one of the biggest tire and wheel retailers in the US for this comparison – Discount Tire.
Here is a comprehensive table that showcases each brand has to offer:
| BFGoodrich | Yokohama | |
| Average Price Range (Discount Tire) | $112 to $747 /ea | $68 to $805 /ea |
| Cheapest Tire (Discount Tire) | Advantage Control goes from $112 – $238 /ea | Iceguard IG53 goes from $68 – $197 /ea |
| Most Expensive Tire (Discount Tire) | Mud Terrain T/A KM3 goes from $217 – $747 /ea | Advan Sport goes from $255 – $805 /ea |
6. Pros and Cons
BFGoodrich
| Pros | Cons |
| ✔ Competitively priced with above-average mileage on the tread-warranties | ❌ They lack tire diversity compared to other brands, and the brand’s passenger options are limited in sizes |
| ✔ Highly focused and specialized in all-season and off-road tires | |
| ✔ Great option for daily commutes and road trips |
Yokohama
| Pros | Cons |
| ✔ Reasonable pricing, offering good value for their cost | ❌ None |
| ✔ Excellent traction, particularly in dry conditions | |
| ✔ Stable and safe handling |
7. Popular Tires
Here are some notable tires from BFGoodrich:
- All-Terrain T/A KO2
- Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
- Advantage T/A Sport LT
Some of Yokohama’s best tires are shown below:
- Advan Apex V601
- Avid Ascend GT
- Geolandar A/T G015
Which Is the Better Brand Overall?
Based on the detailed comparison, the Yokohama tire brand emerges as the better pick overall.
It slightly edges out the BFGoodrich tire in terms of dry performance, excels in wet conditions, and offers comparable snow performance.
Additionally, Yokohama provides a longer potential lifespan for their tires.
Considering these factors, I declare Yokohama as the winner.
